MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 Section 44 Constitutional petition The controversial question of fact will not follow the inquiry of the facts or admit the unnecessary evidence to determine the contentious fact in the constitutional proceedings. To find out about, you need to restrict yourself to the content on the record. The filing of a constitutional petition must show that it has a clear legal right and that its right to performance was so clear that serious questions or disputes not to be acknowledged could be seriously resolved by serious questions of constitutional proceedings. Where the evidence will depend only on the evidence. The facts, petitions, affidavits and documents submitted by the parties referred to in the constitutional petition cannot be fully substantiated, which requires investigation, due to the facts decided by the constitutional petition. May not be appropriate, the conclusion of the facts must be made on the basis of facts. Which constitutional petition was deficient in the event that the constitutional petition was without substance,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
