MUHAMMAD RAZZAQ versus ALAM DIN
Section 42 and App 44, rejecting the appellant's constitutional petition that he was not a grieving person within the meaning of Article 44 of the Constitution, was not available to the High Court, either to withhold it or any other material. To show how the interests of the appellant will be enhanced. Before the High Court is ineligible, the order of the question will be decided by the Supreme Court, usually before the High Court, before the record can be filed without the permission of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the holding of the High Court is correct. This appellant was not an angry person
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Hariwala lawyer