N.-W.F.P. versus ABDUL NASIM KHAN, B.E. (CIVIL) XEN, HIGHWAY PROJECT DIVISION, PESHAWAR
Servant Employees (Appointments, Promotions and Exchanges) Rules 1989 R 17 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Seniority Remarks Government employee was not found to be able to develop on the basis of his record. Which was not found. The development of the BPS 18 should be good enough to guarantee a smooth qualifying payday, while their juniors were promoted to service tribunals while accepting appeals from government employees and nominating seniority. had gone. The tribunal took note of the admission of an official representing the government, saying that the civil servant was given good status but the countersigning officers said that the officer did not impress me much under the pen image, such as contradictory grades and cuts. It was enough to snap a picture of her reality in the picture. This type of pen image has been approved by the service tribunal under the Pencil Recording Rules. Tune, a negative proportion of a public servant, was too ambitious to run a career, especially when considering the length of service extended to the promotion, and obviously he was on duty to perform his duties. There was no nexus with yogurt that is clearly related to civil. The employees did not indicate their entitlement nor because of their eligibility, which made the selection board unfit to promote it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
