Find a Lawyer

UMER HAYAT versus STATE

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 161 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the applicants or other witnesses of the prosecution for the leave to appeal, the accused's liars. The decision had no purpose. The raid was carried out by the magistrate, in whose presence the tainted money was pulled from his pocket and thrown to the ground by the Circle Inspector, a copy of the jambaradi prepared by the accused and the statement presented before the accused in the evidence. That the money was put by the complainant in the pocket of his coat of arms is not credible, given the fact that the conversation between the complainant and the accused was not heard by the witnesses or that the fraudulent money was in his presence. There was no passing, there was no point in watching. In such cases, the prosecutor's appeal was denied by the leave of the prosecution. advocate for immigration from Lower Dir lawyer