Find a Lawyer

GANESH versus THE STATE

Definition of Section 302/34 evidence was promptly filed with the FIR and the accused was named in the FIR with their weapons. The motive was not reduced to mystery as the accused himself admitted that he had The defaulter has some money owed and said that there has been a recurrence of debt repayments. Only two days before the incident, the ocular evidence provided by the prosecution's witnesses between her and the defendant left no doubt about the guilt of the prosecution witnesses, although they were close relatives of the victim, but to prove it. There was nothing for them to do against the accused. Both prosecution witnesses did not confirm the testimony of the prosecution witness at the meeting of the person identified as harmony, crime, weapons and injuries at each material point, although no clear witness to the prosecution was a close relative, but merely a relative. Not enough was enough for the defamation, especially when it was not proven that he had demonstrated enormous enmity, hostility or hostility against the accused was based on medical evidence. The accused was linked to the crime proved beyond any reasonable shadow of doubt, the trial court granted That which is based on reasonable reasoning and not harming it, cannot be interfered with advocate for immigration from Havelian lawyer