Find a Lawyer

SAMINA YOUNAS versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Transfer of the provisions of Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 9 West Pakistan Government Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1966, Art 19 and 29 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Petitions High to restoration of the Constitution. Court jurisdiction In the petition against the transfer of a public servant, the public servants may be held liable to serve within or outside the province, cannot be insisted on a particular post or specific post for dispute / dispute. As it relates to the posting and transfer of a government employee's terms and conditions of employment. A complaint arising out of the terms and conditions of employment under the jurisdiction of the service tribunal of the High Court will only lead to the complaint of a person who, under Article 212 of the Constitution, is not attracted by the Constitutional bar of public servants (applicants). ) Clearly committed the infringement. The Code of Conduct, which is listed in the Code of Conduct on June 19 and 29, does not require such litigation to position itself through the political influence of the West Pakistan Government (Con Duct) Rule, 1966. Such relief should not be expected, nor could they be extended relief in the exercise of equal constitutional jurisdiction. Constitutional petitions against transfer orders were dismissed for their information and such action to the Chief Secretary. , The Health Secretary and the Home Secretary should be directed to be forwarded as they are against both the Applicants and the Respondents. Seeking to violate RR 19 & 29, the Government of West Pakistan (Practices) Rules, 1966, independently. The High Court observed immigration advocates phone number from Dandot lawyer