Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus GHULAM MURTAZA


The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 case for the harassment plaintiff failed to prove that it had made the petition in the sitting or the meeting in which it was sold under question. Was detected. And that they had previously expressed their intention to exercise the right, thus, had not been established, that no postal receipt was included in the evidence that it could be assumed that the legal notice of the accused His letter (to the defendant) was reached, not even a postman was presented. Nothing was available to record that the postal facility was not available in the interrogation area, however, The source was not proven, so he could not exercise his right to plead, and thus could not establish a case beforehand. The plaintiff's former jurisdiction, if any, was extinguished under section 13, the constitutional provisions contained in the Punjab Pre-UK Act 1991.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Tando Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.