Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus GHULAM MURTAZA

The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 case for the harassment plaintiff failed to prove that it had made the petition in the sitting or the meeting in which it was sold under question. Was detected. And that they had previously expressed their intention to exercise the right, thus, had not been established, that no postal receipt was included in the evidence that it could be assumed that the legal notice of the accused His letter (to the defendant) was reached, not even a postman was presented. Nothing was available to record that the postal facility was not available in the interrogation area, however, The source was not proven, so he could not exercise his right to plead, and thus could not establish a case beforehand. The plaintiff's former jurisdiction, if any, was extinguished under section 13, the constitutional provisions contained in the Punjab Pre-UK Act 1991. pakistani advocates Khanbel lawyer