Find a Lawyer

ASIF SAIGOL versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Federal Investigation Agency Act 1974 Article 199 Panel Code (XV of 1860), Articles 382 and 406 of the Federal Investigation Agency Act (VIII of 1975), Preamble and Ordinance of Section 3 Banking Companies (LVI1 of 1962), Sections 27, 40, 41, 47, Investigating 83 and State 84 of the State Bank of Pakistan Act (XXXII of XXXII), Section, AA and Constitution 36 of the Constitutional Pet Button Cushing Case against the applicant under the Federal Investigation Agency, section 2382 and cotton. Cotton6, a case of theft and misuse was registered in Cotton Stock under PPC. Applicant's mill premises as a bank security had previously claimed that the Federal Investigation Agency had no jurisdiction to register and investigate the matter in which private individuals were presented as accused and It can only investigate by filing a case. Where the crime was committed in connection with a federally owned company. Secondly, the matter was of civil nature as the defendant bank filed a civil lawsuit in the Banking Court which is pending and third, the schedule attached to the Federal Investigation Agency Act 1975 under Section RO No. 826 I97. Was substituted and section 382 was changed. 406, the PPC under which the case was filed, was deleted, thus, the Federal Investigation Agency was left with no jurisdiction to proceed in the matter, as the petitioner's meeting was overturned. Because the defendant bank, being a scheduled bank, was under the supervision and supervision of the State Bank of Pakistan, and the federal government's authority would extend to the respondent bank, thus, in relation to the scheduled bank how to become a advocate from Takhtbai lawyer