Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASMAT ULLAH versus SURAYA KAUSAR

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXXX Temporary Injunction and Interlocutory Orders A XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 and Section 115 Revision Temporary Order Probation, Appeals for Fraud Forum Charges for Trial Applicant Reviewed by the High Court Appellant requested that the provisional order be removed by the appellate court. It was restored to the request that the applicant seized the underground land and he was claiming the respondents were purchased from the applicant through a false statement and forged through fraudulent powers, under investigation of the case. The question of counterfeiting could have been raised later but it is currently to be seen that if the first case was in favor of the applicant's record then it was evident that the mutation was confirmed by the Revenue Officer in public. Did not, because such a case is serious as long as it does not prove fraudulent. It is Applicants who are facing deficit in favor of the respondents also cannot be relieved. female advocates from Amangarh lawyer