Find a Lawyer

SALIM RAZA versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 35, and 397 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (Article 4 of 1979), Article 3 was charged by separate decisions in two cases, which were referred to in the Prohibition (Enforcement Order) Article. 3 was arrested in two cases. In 1979, he was convicted and sentenced in separate cases to separate convictions and charged with 4 years RI in one case and 3 years RI in another case, He prayed that there should be two punishments. According to the CRPC, under section 35, the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, not in two separate cases in the same case, but in the same case for two or more offenses, instead of a continuous charge. Harmony was treated. As a result, it was neither the trial court's discretion to pass a second sentence to consolidate the sentence, but in the absence of any such direction, permanent trial decisions would be carried out. In both cases, in the case of the URT, the accused is punished for harmony or otherwise, in the case of silence, so, in the case of the accused not using his discretion, The trial court is run on a regular basis, so there is no difficulty in reaching a conclusion. The punishment, which was in the first time, was followed by the punishment in the second case. In both cases the circumstances were treated appropriately and legally [conviction]. top advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer