Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT

Rules of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) 1977 Rr 4 & 5 Roll of Business of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, 1985, R9 AJ Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974; Section 44 Constitutional Jurisdiction) Application from Lukas Standi) action was taken against the civil servants under the rules of competence and discipline, the proceedings were terminated in their favor, under the provisions of the Rules of Business, the authorities were allowed Need to act accordingly, or the competent authority to re-consider the matter. If, in his discretion, the order passed by the authority was a violation of a principle or a breach of facts on the record or against government policy, it is indicated that the matter was not presented to the competent authority for reconsideration. Nor did the authorities intend to do so in the future. The public servant correctly requested the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court to pray that the authorities should be instructed to enforce the order of the competent authority that it was authorized by the competent authority against the public servant. Issue notification in relation to the action as per order. advocate from Ali Chak lawyer