Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY

Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Administration for Equity Property) Act, 1961 Section 18A (1) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), final for any of the allotment rehabilitation in favor of the respondents in respect of section 42 allotment. Was successful. Authorities were asked to cancel the same question as petitioner's old tenant in the petition, however, although it was raised specifically, it was not resolved, resulting in justice. Misunderstood, giving the old tenant ownership rights will protect against eviction. Altiz, too, was ordered by the Custodian to resolve the question of the status of appeals in underground land as old tenants and to protect their rights at the time of removal to the extent provided in the relevant law. However, Custodian did not point out that the status of appellants as old tenants was a question of fact which could be determined on the basis of the validity of the record without advertisement allowing the matter to be resolved under law. Which is also within the bounds of the constitutional jurisdiction contained in the question, from the record based on the Dogra Regime to the present Appellants remain in custody and the restoration authorities are also High Court Failure to determine the status of the appellants as to the old tenants, which could be determined on the approval of the relevant record, the appellants were the old underground tenants, And his position as the defendant was disputed, and Custodian was remanded to investigate the matter. In this case whether the appellant is his old tenant famous lower court advocate from Gujar Khan lawyer