Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ SHAH versus CANTONMENT BOARD, ABBOTTABAD


Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art, 199 of the Cantonment Act 1924 sections 60 and 61 were challenged on the basis that it was imposed without the approval and approval of the federal government and this discrimination was imposed only on it. had gone. There was no evidence on the record that the Cantonment Board was empowered to impose any kind of tax on the citizens under the same justified provision of the Security 60, Cantonment Act, 1924. Was not brought in to suggest that the petitioners had raised any objection to it. To them, two receipts were added, which would indicate the submission of development charges along with the petition that the imposition of development charges was issued with the federal government's prior approval, so no legal charges against the development charges. An exception cannot be taken, therefore, the constitutional application challenged was not enforceable

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.