Find a Lawyer

SONA KHAN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 409/420/468/471/109 18 The prosecution's prosecution was filed almost 18 years ago and 4 After the full invoice was presented in court. During the 1/2 year of trial enrollment, during the last 14 years after the trial began, only a few prosecutor's witnesses were examined in the entirety of the 63 witnesses mentioned in the full challan, although most witnesses were civil servants and the last 14 For years there were suspects. No one can be held guilty of regularly appearing in a trial court and delayed. Of the 18 accused, 5 died in lengthy proceedings, seven of them retired after the trial, and three were dismissed by the High Court. A separate order was upheld by the State Council. The trial court was unable to conclude the trial in a lengthy period of 14 years despite the high court's directive that the trial be adjourned within a stipulated period. ivly and the accused cannot be held guilty of any wrongdoing. The accused have already suffered mental and financial torture which is a sufficient punishment for them, and no criminal purpose could be served if criminal proceedings were allowed against them. There is no possibility of an end in the near future, it is not yet known whether the role played in the crime against the accused will not have any meaningful result as the material and other evidence on record. No matter from. Successfully litigated against the accused law websites from Kundina lawyer