Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD UMAR

Limit Act 1908 Article 142 After discussing the evidence in each case, the judgment of the appellate court for ownership under title by the two courts under the trial court indicated that it had analyzed the entire evidence. Has discussed and given the proper reasons. In the conclusion that the appeal is not worthy of any consideration and the matters involved in the same matter were properly dismissed by the courts below, there was apparently no illegality, weakness or misrepresentation of the evidence reviewed. On the basis of which the plaintiff was entitled to dismiss. The plaintiff was entitled to take possession of the land while the defendants had no claim to retain their possession. immigration advocates contact from Shemier lawyer