Find a Lawyer

HIDAYATULLAH versus SHAHAN

Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 The order to grant bail to the accused was neither appropriate nor proper ground on which the sessions court granted the accused's bail, namely, accused 1. He was in jail till 1 /. 2 years, the filing of the FIR was delayed, and the prosecution's evidence was contradictory, completely false, and the baseless defendants could not be released on bail only because they were in the murder case for 1/1 to 2 years. While in jail, the earlier plea of the accused was denied bail, saying that there was no definite delay in filing the FIR, and yet the sessions court had dismissed the high court's recoveries and On the basis that the accused was granted bail, the evidence of the prosecution was not inconsistent, but the prosecution was a case. After the complainant's evidence became more and more strong, and such a Sessions Court of Injury testified, he granted the bail of the accused illegally in a murder case on false and corrupt grounds. The NDS Sessions Court was there to believe that further investigation into the accused's case was needed, under which the accused's bail was revoked. advocates from Balakot lawyer