IFTIKHAR AHMED DAR versus STATE
The eye-witnesses were not mentioned in the FIR by the complainant, defining the retrieval of Section 103 evidence in the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 307/34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), and they made an exaggeration in the case. Was given a shocking and impossible version that was not confirmed by medical evidence when the suspect's identity at the time of the incident was highly suspicious, it seemed that the incident was unannounced and the eyewitnesses were very interested in the story. Disapproved by the CCP regarding the knife recovery on the defendant's offer, it was legal It was not useful for excretion, especially when it was not found that human blood was completely stained, which was alleged by the chemical examiner to be exacerbated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Bannu lawyer
