MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. versus THATTA SUGAR MILLS
To recover the loan amount based on the OXXXVII, R3 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 577 negotiating device on the CPC summary procedure of the Civil Procedure Code Order XXXVII Leave to appear in suit and to follow the terms and conditions of follow-up guarantee, and the contents of the letter of the plaintiff's lawyer's legal adviser indicate that the defendant is not barred under the Limitation Act, 1908, and the defendant Had their own securities guaranteed and are obliged to repay the loan with the plaintiff's mark. However, the lawyer stated that the defendants should be granted leave to appear and defend on the grant of bail. However, the case and defense suit were allowed, but the plaintiff corporation only gave bank guarantee in favor of the plaintiff. The submission of the order to the accused Nazir upon submission, the satisfaction of the order within the stipulated period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
