Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD SALEHEEN versus ARSHAD SIDDIQ


Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) cancellation of bail, submitted by the High Court, self-passport, PIA ticket and other documents After checking the documentation. The suspects came to the conclusion that the alibi petition they received was not only supported by the first party, the records available on the record, but also by the ASDPO's report that the involvement of the other two accused in the case was increased. The hearing was heard by the High Court. Further investigation is needed after considering the role attributed to them in the FIR, and Albey's plea of his co-accused, the High Court, did not act improperly or, both of the accused's bail was canceled and the bail granted. Was too lean to do. The leave to appeal the respondents of two other suspects was denied in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Dhatmal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.