MUHAMMAD SALEHEEN versus ARSHAD SIDDIQ
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) cancellation of bail, submitted by the High Court, self-passport, PIA ticket and other documents After checking the documentation. The suspects came to the conclusion that the alibi petition they received was not only supported by the first party, the records available on the record, but also by the ASDPO's report that the involvement of the other two accused in the case was increased. The hearing was heard by the High Court. Further investigation is needed after considering the role attributed to them in the FIR, and Albey's plea of his co-accused, the High Court, did not act improperly or, both of the accused's bail was canceled and the bail granted. Was too lean to do. The leave to appeal the respondents of two other suspects was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Dhatmal lawyer