OBEDULLAH versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL, FRONTIER CORPS, QUETTA
Deputy Collector Customs ordered the seizure of goods in his order for smuggling goods out of the country on the charge of confiscating goods by customs authorities, Article 185 (3) of the Customs Act, 1969. Are. The Established Collector (Appeal) rejected the appeal and authorized the applicants that they were subject to payment of a conditional penalty for redemption which is 50% of the cost. Authorities have auctioned. Things in the public treasury have already been sold before applicants can seek treatment before the High Court. It has been inappropriate for the courts to restore the original goods to the applicants, dismissing the constitutional request against the customs authorities' order As such, no material facts or legal weakness were encountered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Lala rukh lawyer
