NADEEM AHMED versus THE STATE
Definition of Section 13D Proof of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 The trial court rejected the defense version on the same issue because the Investigation Officer was not kept, even though the presence of such other important witnesses was examined on the matter. Was checked. Two different versions, one given by the prosecution and the other by defense, the court was obliged to hold them only to the conclusion that they failed to carry out the entire evidence recorded by the trial court. Was, therefore, needed to be re-examined. As a result, the conviction and sentence of the accused were set aside and, after considering all the evidence available on record, the case was referred to the trial court for a new verdict.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Sakardu lawyer
