Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LIMITED versus NASEER AHMED

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 409/109/34 Corruption Prevention Act (III 1947), Section 5 (2) pre-arrest FIR showed that the accused and his accomplices Employees of the federal government and the public are nimble. Funds have intentionally and willfully misused their public office to commit a criminal trust violation of Rs 175 million which was shown as a fugitive in the challan submitted to the accused court. Was deliberately avoided joining or presenting before the trial court FIR further stated that the prosecution was not motivated by any malicious or perverse motive and any case of humiliation, unnecessary harassment or false interference. Did not happen, the principle of consistency was not attracted because the co-accused got bail after his arrest. Was. The accused applied for a pre-arrest bail that operates under completely different rules property advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer