ABDUL QAYYUM versus THE STATE
The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13, the complainant of the definition of evidence, became his accomplice, the evidence could not be accepted until any other material evidence could be confirmed which lacked a rifle. The complainant was not recovered, his responsibility was on satisfactory explanation. The possession of the said illegal arm was not excluded, it cannot be ruled out that the accused was involved in the rescue of the complainant whose father, being a District Accounts Officer, had every influence to influence the police and the investigating agency. Had the opportunity. The accused was acquitted in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Rahwali lawyer