Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

RASHID versus STATE


Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Complaint dismissing section 561A lawsuit, filed an affidavit of such position in the trial court and apologized to the accused Lee was. In fact, the accused was granted amnesty and, to that extent and to what extent and if there was no other material for the conviction, the trial court could only determine and the accused had the right to make Section 265, c. An alternative to filing an application under the RPC was that he be acquitted of the charge. The High Court submitted that there was no reasonable basis on which the trial proceedings before the trial court could be directly rejected by the High Court under its extraordinary jurisdiction under section 1 561A. The PC Petition was dismissed within the limits.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Barkhan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.