Find a Lawyer

KHURRAM PERVAIZ OPAL versus UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY LAHORE

Presented with applicants for Category \ M such grades against seats reserved for admissions university employees for Bachelor Degree Course in Session 1992 93, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), University of Engineering and Technology. Had to do. His application, the certificate of the registrar of the university, that the applicant's parents were full time employees at the university and that he has served the university for less than five consecutive years and that he resigned from the petitioner's father. Service was not quit. The university served in 1964 and until 1970, after which he went on extraordinary leave until 21 12 1975, and after that, joined the civil service and resigned from the University service to petitioner in the category \ M in. I was denied admission that his father had resigned from the University Service Petitioner. He said his qualification for admission to his father's resignation had no effect on the resignation of the university service headed by Valdity Petitioner's father of the High Court, which was accepted by the Vice-Chancellor of the university, According to the condition mentioned in the prospectus, the applicant was not eligible / eligible for admission in the category \ M admission, therefore, should be taken to the disputed decision of the High Court which went on the correct premises, legal and factual. Appeal leave was denied on the grounds that the application was also vacated by any qualification. top advocate from Farooqabad lawyer