ISAM GUL versus MIR KHAN
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3) Suit for Appeal of a Private Partition Suit for Distribution of Property Both sides were partners in the suit land, excluding specific measles numbers, in which the applicant as the owner The High Court found that as the applicant was the owner of the suit land, his suit in respect of the suit land should not have been rejected except for the specific deficit numbers in which it did not show the owner. And the applicant's suit should have been decided by the extent of that section. Appeal denied, dismissed by the family arrangement of which he was a shareholder under which he was always subject to regular distribution, based on a proper assessment of the revenue record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Dhatmal lawyer
