Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IJAZ AHMAD versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Bail, no ocular evidence grant available against the accused on murder charge Was not The fact that the prosecution witnesses saw the victim first and after some distance they saw that the accused was going in that direction did not mean that the accused was chasing or going with the accused and so on. The evidence for the last time cannot be considered as evidence of the prosecution's testimony. There is no point in the FIR of those who were earlier accused of making extra judicial confessions, and the evidence of extra-judicial confession may not be enough to convict the accused, much of the evidence of recovery. Can be used for more serious than. Significant evidence of this, but could not prove itself guilty, was granted in the leave of appeal appeal and the accused was granted bail in the cases.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.