NOOR MUHAMMAD versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act 1958 Section 17 (1B) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Appeal of Wapda Employee Employee to the Department of Retirement Employees was accepted to the extent that they were reinstated. ? But the interference between his compulsory retirement and rehabilitation was considered an extraordinary leave with no salary and no compensation, claiming to return employee appeal questions before the service tribunal was not successfully met. The reason for the job was that it was a random order. While appellate authority withheld salaries and withdrawal benefits for the period in which their appeal was pending, it was utterly blatant. When his appeal was accepted, he was entitled to all the benefits, from the date of compulsory retirement to the date of his retirement leave.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Machh lawyer
