LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus MUHAMMAD RASHID
Amendments filed by the local authority in the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 115 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), which the High Court has pointed out. The court clearly showed that authority officials showed sheer negligence in clearing the review request, which was returned by the office to remove the objection and finish it within seven days. On the contrary, the statement submitted in about a year's time was not found by the High Court to be able to convince the applicant for such a delay and rightly so the powers of the Registrar's Office were granted. That they can raise an objection and have the authority to schedule time to remove the corresponding amendment request The set period was canceled long after the expiry and so it was rejected. As for timely restrictions, even on the merits, look at the conclusions filed by the two courts based on the documentary evidence they see. Was not open to any legitimate exception, therefore, no interference in the High Court verdict was guaranteed, and in the judgment of the courts, the leave of appeal was refused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
