MUHAMMAD HAYAT JAMALDINI versus RETURNING OFFICER/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, NOUSHKI PB-50 CHAGHI
Representation of Articles 12, 14 and 99 of the Pakistan Act 1976, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 62 and 63 nomination papers rejected by the Returning Officer on the day of examination on the absence of the candidate, his authorized agent / proposer Or secondly the Accreditation Returning Officer will have to satisfy himself whether the candidate was selected or not to be a member. Also, whether the proposer or the second papers were eligible for the nomination membership, their presence, therefore, required the Returning Officer to satisfy himself whether sections 12 and 13 were complied with by the Representative People Act 1976 or Neither the proposer nor the second signature was genuine or otherwise where neither the candidate nor his authorized agent was the proposer or the other person, the returning officer had no option but to reject the nomination papers.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Hariwala lawyer