Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus STATE

Customs Act 1969 Section 156 (1) (8) (89) Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 397, 382b and 561 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) , Article 199 Constitution Petition The defendant, who is already convicted for any other offense, has neither the sessions court to run, neither the accused to pass the sentence nor the federal law. The court upheld its conviction and sentence under Article 3 of the appeal. The Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order, 1979, directed that the subsequent punishment be registered by a special court under section 156 (1) (8) (89) of the Customs Act, 1969. Will run concurrently with. , Misuse or violation of the law may indicate that the accused's two sentences do not work: simultaneously by the courts, for that reason, was required to proceed permanently under the law. The use of the inherent powers of the High Court under section 6161 AA, CCPC in the case matters is not guaranteed, as well as the extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction by the courts under section 2B2B, CCP The benefit of C is given. In both cases, however, both sentences were entitled to benefit from it separately, according to the constitutional application dismissed [sentence]. advocates from Patoki lawyer