Find a Lawyer

MILITARY ESTATE OFFICER, QUETTA CIRCLE, QUETTA CANTT. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER-CUM-COLLECTOR, QUETTA

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18, 50 (2), Provo and 54 Appeal / Reference against Compensation and Rehabilitation and Settlement of Reference by the Department concerned whose acquisition of the benefit of Section 50 (2), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Was provided. Indicates that the relevant department for the acquisition of beneficial land could not be filed under section 18, or could not be appealed under section 54, the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In its decision, the Shariat Appeal Bench of the Supreme Court upheld the provisions of Sections 18 and 50, the Land Acquisition Act. In so far as it has violated Islamabad's merger, it has prohibited or banned the local authority, the company or the federal government or its department, either for reference or to appeal. But the effect of inserting provisions that prevented the federal government from ending was over. After the important date, namely, after September 30, 1991, when the law was deemed to have been amended even though no amendment had been made yet, the federal government or its relevant department has been made, thus, as determined by the collector. Can file a reference / appeal for eligibility against the cost of the land; the right to file or appeal a reference by the relevant department, company or federal government, however, will likely be enforced, namely 30. September, 1991 An appeal in this case was filed on September 7, 1995, thus, competent and maintainable. how to become a advocate from Depal Pur lawyer