Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF RAILWAY POLICE versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ


Police Rules 1934 R16 24 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Prohibition of permanent two-year increase for police personnel is not free from prejudice against the police officer 8 Disclosure of the disclosure officer 8 24 24 24 , Police Rules, 1934 Impact Service Tribunal Fines Employees For service reasons, the service tribunal did not face any legal weakness for valid reasons, the Inquiry Officer acted under a misconception of the law, assuming that the employees were in defense Providing the opportunity to present evidence was not necessary, though it was requested for the same Tribunal of Service Tribunal under which the employee The fine was imposed was set aside, did not have to face the legal weakness of any kind, the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal in these circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Kotla Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.