MUHAMMAD IKRAM ALIAS MUNJI versus THE STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 11, 10 (3) and 10 (2) of the evidence cage have been with the kidnapping accused in his free will and the record of the kidnapping offense against him proved to be a crime. Had not happened And under Section 11 of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance, 1979, the doctor was convicted and no injuries were found on any part of the body of the abductor and in the interim examination. He admitted that adultery was physically resisted during sexual intercourse, thus the offense against the accused was not found guilty under section 10 (3) of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement Hoodood) Ordinance 1979 and It was changed to section 10 (2). Of the said ordinance and accordingly he was sentenced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kamalia lawyer
