ABDUL MALIK versus THE STATE
Order of Prohibition 1979 Article Article 4 The definition of evidence was not illegal on the part of any public witness, since the recovery of heroin was allegedly from the personal possession of the accused, otherwise it was also proof. That the police had called the assemblers at the scene to be witnesses in the case, but they refused. So the defendant had no use of defense evidence, in which case the defendant's sentence was maintained, it was alleged that he was not a notorious drug dealer and no measure was recovered from his possession, his prison sentence. Was reduced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Chicha watni lawyer
