EHSAN ULLAH versus STATE
Prohibited (Order) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), retrieval of section 103 and 165 evidence violated the mandatory provisions of section 165, PC read with section 103, CR PC There was no witness from the side. Despite the influence in a very populated area, the public joined the process and no explanation was given about such contradiction in the amount of opium sent to the Chemical Examiner and its quantity was sent to the Chemical Examiner's office. The truth was received. There is no doubt that in the present case, the Chemical Examiner's report on the sample sent to the police or the sample of any other case, the evidence of recovery was inconsistent, the accused was acquitted in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Mustang lawyer
