Find a Lawyer

DILBAR HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Colonization of Government Land (Punjab) Act (v. 1912), Section 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Order of Consent New Application Prior to the plaintiff's claim against the plaintiff against whom the decision in question was made, an order under section 12 (2), CPC was challenged which led to the order under section 12 (2). The defendant was practiced in obtaining the statement, the CPC was acquitted. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the appellate court, the High Court, affirmed that the confessional statement of the defendant was recorded by the trial court and a copy of his identification card was attached to his written statement, also the identity of the accused. This was done by a lawyer. From such evidence, there can be no legal exception to the finding filed by the courts that the allegation of fraud and misrepresentation was not made on record number. Weaknesses were identified by the courts in the definition of evidence. The defendants tried to raise a new plea which they did not take to the courts, underneath the document which contained the sale agreement, which was, in fact, a sale agreement, which was targeted by Article 19, the provisions of the Colonization. ? The Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912) could not accept such petitions in the following courts, but for the first time the cases of the Supreme Court defendants would not fall within the purview of Section 12 (2). CPC was refused to appeal even if it was allowed to extend such a request. patent advocate from Jauharabad lawyer