Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

STATE versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM SHEIKH, ADVOCATE


The contempt of court Act 1976 section 4 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 of the contempt of court notice in a statement of the respondent is not only to discredit the judges of the Supreme Court in relation to his office but also to damage the public's trust in him. Was also calculated. Freedom, impartiality, and the integrity of the Supreme Court and the judges who insulted the contempt court. The second statement given by the defendant was the interruption, obstruction and prejudice in the process of law or as a result of judicial proceedings, ie contempt of court proceedings. The court, after being informed of the basis for the contempt of court charges, and against it, constituted a contemptuous respondent, which resulted in him being asked why under section 4 of the contempt of court Act 1976 Can't be punished.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Upper Deval lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.