Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus GAZALA RIAZ

Section 54 of the Property Act 1882, the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the Constitution42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the acquisition of title by the sale of title to the acquisition of land by the division of the common land. Appears in the suit. Decision by the trial court The trial court's order was also set by the appellate court, and the High Court also questioned the judicial sale deed in the amendment, which was neither presented nor presented. Neither the land in question was exchanged, however, on the basis of the sale process, it was presented to the court which showed that the defendants had purchased some part of the underground land. For the first time a copy of the sale agreement was presented to the Supreme Court, which saw the same thing in the wider interest of justice. The fact that the physical possession of the land was given to the plaintiffs and they took over the entire land purchased by them is a fact of fact that there are questions in the land or in the specific land, the two courts below have formally declared Had found such a question. That they purchased the land, the site plan attached to the sale deed, was not guaranteed by the Supreme Court to interfere with the High Court's decision, permission to appeal was denied in the circumstances Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sudhnoti lawyer