KHUSHI MUHAMMAD versus ZAKIYA MUSHTAQ AHMAD
Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Pre-Impression Suit Tenant's Case On Decision 31 197 1974 Premature Notice of Land Withdrawal Order, Revenue Court Against Tenant Approved 8 1 1974, viz. Nearly 6 months before the lawsuit was filed, the tenant's Lux Standy had approved the eviction order against the tenant for filing a pre-arrest lawsuit, after which it was no longer challenged, the Land Reform Regulation, Under 1972, Para 25 has attained the finality, in which respect the right of the tenants was previously granted the right of autonomy. The land involved in his tenancy, however, ceased to exist when the order of eviction against the tenant was passed, so he was not in favor of the owner if he was to sell it to the landlord. Before that, no evidence should be provided. Originally executed on the eviction order, he was not yet able to claim any right of eviction from the country as he was left to be a tenant after the withdrawal order was approved. The final order of eviction will end tenancy and ten ants will be denied as tenants when it was ordered whether the tenant was evicted by executing the decree or not. , The relevant order of the Board of Revenue was not to dismiss the tenant's case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer