Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

Civil Procedure Code Order XLI of Appeals of RCPOLC, R1 (R), AXLVII, R1, OLAXIX, RRL, 2 and Section 115 CPC During the trial for the cancellation of the application under IAXLIX, RRL & 2, CPC, the trial court also applied for review of such order by the trial court against this order. Was rejected under the revision under which the application for a temporary injunction was dismissed but the plaintiff chose to file an application for review before the trial rather than requesting the action. The temporary injunction dismissal court order did not face any patent error on record, therefore, it was not liable to review it, even under OXLVII, R1, CPC. There was also no scope for review of the trial court's first order in the petition. As such, the trial court granted a motion to dismiss, but no appeal was filed against the order that the plaintiff's prayer be revised because the appeal was not granted. Given that the appeal filing was over family advocate from Shankiari lawyer