Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAH versus INAYATULLAH

Prior to the trial of the trial court on the basis of the plaintiffs having the highest rights over the power of the trial court, section 15 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913, the appellate court dismissed the case that no defendant was present in the witness box and that The plaintiff has been declared a plaintiff in connection with the litigation. The cross-examination acknowledged the shopkeeper's relationship with the plaintiffs and further acknowledged that the defendants (vendors) were not in any way related to the seller. The defendant's evidence fulfilled the condition that the plaintiffs related to the defendants. Finding a relationship, however, as the claimant's claim alone can be presented on the power of the claimant's statement, the dispute over the land value / value issue will be concluded while the appellate court dismissing the claimant's claim. The decision was put aside. The plaintiff, who prosecuted the trial, was restored to the circumstances solicitors from Sambrial lawyer