JAMIL AKHTAR SIDDIQUI versus SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
The Constitution Act of 1908, Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3), delayed the hearing of the plea for a five-day ban on the request that the service tribunal failed to send certified copies of the approved orders. ? At cost, he applied himself and got over time but waited for certified copies or pending orders, which were to be sent through the Office of Service Tribunal but failed to receive them, he appealed. And included it with his certified copy. However, he did not rule out the orders which had barred the petition filed by the court from five days and the applicants had obtained a certified copy of the impugned order on the specified D and sought leave for appeal within time. Should have been filed. Due to a satisfactory delay in filing the application for leave of appeal, the applicant refused the explanation given by him and failed because he was refused in this case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
