WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus KHUSHI MUHAMMAD
The West Pakistan WAPDA (Water Wing) Service of Engineers Rules, 1968 R 5 (2) (a) (ii) being a diploma holder in the drafting and designing of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212, refused to be developed on this basis. Although he was not a diploma, the holder in the relevant field, the Civil or Mechanical Service Tribunal, directed the authorities to consider the question of respondents' publicity. Prior to being a Diploma holder in Accuracy Responder, Drafting and Designing, he was first promoted / placed in B16 and his seniority was also decided with other sub engineers and technology based No objection was made by the respondent who acknowledged that the diploma was a holder even though it was sufficiently qualified to progress against the 20% quota in drafting and designing and meeting the other conditions mentioned in the relevant rules as the service correctly found. ? The case of the Tribunal respondents, thus, considered the qualifications of all the other engineers to be different from the fitness which the selection board or the departmental nalal publicity committee would consider on the basis of the complete service record and overall performance of the concerned officer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
