Find a Lawyer

AMIR JAN versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Civil Procedure Code Order VI of the CPC General Code Generally Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VI, R 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for litigation by the plaintiffs Meeting the requirement was a specific issue. A framework was developed in connection with the completion of the negotiations on which both parties presented evidence. The trial court decided such a case on the basis of the examination of the evidence in favor of the plaintiff. The court upheld the re-evaluation of the evidence. The question is whether the requirements of Section 13 were fulfilled as a pure question of fact; the simultaneous discoveries on the evidence scrutiny by the following court, including the High Court, cannot be disturbed simply because. That the details of the first plaintiff are not stated in the plaintiff if the requirement of the law is met. It was claimed that after the sale was discovered, the pre-emptor declared that there was not enough evidence to prove the evidence presented in this case intended to terminate such sale. Needless to say, the plaintiff alleged in her claimant's first injunction, that the matter was compiled and evidence of her evidence was presented, though she should be claimed against her, even though she should be released independently. As well as be understood. The fact is not clearly and not stated in the statements, the court was empowered to inquire into the matter in the light of the evidence, which led to the following courts finding out about this question. Is that Talbi was created first and the Act Act law firms from Loralai lawyer