SUALEH SONS (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Contract Act 1872 Section 2 (h) Legal Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 114 The plaintiff claiming the rising cost due to the inflation of the water reservoir by the plaintiff on payment of specific costs to the plaintiff has completed Offered a specific amount for final satisfaction. The claim that he accepted without any protest / reservation, as a result, after a gap of three years, cannot be denied by the claim that the question was accepted by him under a strong suit. Was brought, therefore, to prevent it from being raised and to raise any objection. In the absence of strong evidence and explanatory explanations, the plaintiff was protesting at the most controversial stage of the case, or on such an admission, therefore, was not entitled to claim the rising cost in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
