MUHAMMAD NAQI versus RASHIDA BEGUM
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 11 and O VII, R11 Race Judicata, The principle of application was principally the judgment against the plaintiff in the property lawsuit against this judgment and any Appeal / review was not filed The case after the plaintiff on the same property fell in the same manner as Res Judeta's theory, in section 11, the CPC was not entitled to retain the case on the declaration of the plaintiff title, on the plaintiff under the CPC The ban was imposed. In addition, in 1963 the plaintiff, seeking the termination of the transfer orders in favor of the defendant's predecessor, was also subjected to a cease-fire, in which a declaration in connection with the grant of possession was made, The interests of those accused of illegally and in violation of the rights and interests of the accused were retained. And against that the law was approved at the Supreme Court level
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Kotli Loharan lawyer