Find a Lawyer

FAZALUR REHMAN versus BATUL

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Article 55, when the essence of the contract is entitled to the specific performance of the contract when the sale of immovable property contracts is not the point of contract unless the parties are Don't be. This agreement was not considered to be the essence of the agreement by the express agreement where the contract was timed to fulfill the contract but was extended beyond the stipulated period and then extended. can go. The contract was required to obtain the required certificate by a certain date, failing which option rested with the claimant to cancel the contract, instead keeping the contract alive and the contract Claims to have failed to obtain the required certificate in the terms of the contract. The six-year-old plaintiff could not be thereafter, any time the unilateral contract was decided to be executed within a certain time, it was invalidated at the buyer's option, but he agreed. Except that at any time you choose to insist on its performance, the Claimant's claim will not be entitled to compensation. In the case of property, the suit against the tenant was not affirmed, under which it was agreed to proceed against the tenant at the expense of his expense as far as the defendant's claim for restraining the claimant's claim was concerned. The mental anguish and suffering caused by the source will be compensated. The performance of the deal, he failed to prove such mental torture and torture, therefore, he was not entitled to claim that much money in the record. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mailsi lawyer