Border Services Civil Tribunal Province 1973 Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Prior to the petitioner as an Assistant Professor of Development Respondents, the Service Tribunal found its basis on the High Court decision under which the High Court. The respondent's constitutional request found that the matter for postponement of respondents' development was pending before the Board of Publicity and that the applicant was equally qualified that the appropriate tribunal had reduced the appropriate tribunal by the decision of the High Court Service. The defendant was eligible for promotion as an Assistant Professor and this panel applied and responded The Senior Registrar, including Nadgan, were equally qualified. The final result was that all qualified senior registrars were considered a touchstone of qualifications and experience, and the respondent was rightly entitled to progress because of the circumstances in which the Assistant Professor appealed. Was denied leave of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
