Find a Lawyer

HAYAT GUL versus REHM BIBI

Convene Evidence Order 1984 Article 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) for claiming that the plaintiff (defendant) was the owner of the suit land and the alleged sale contract in favor of the defendants to deny the title of owner The tenant's assumption was for stoppage to the plaintiff during the occupation of the property under the plaintiff plaintiff when he continued to occupy his possession, claiming to have entered into the possession of the land in question under the property. If he fails to prove such a sale in his favor, the real defendant has purchased the land and will be considered to have possession. The lease agreement remained in place until it surrendered to the occupier of its lease, even if it refused to honor the commissioner's honor during his lease term. In the judgment of the High Court, the decision of the plaintiff's case was pronounced and the judgment was separated. The first appellate court under which the plaintiff's case was dismissed was not open to interference. There is no weakness in the decision of the HC. divorce advocates from Daska lawyer